Agents of Change: Understanding User Perspectives to Guide Inclusive Gym Practices

Authors

  • Fallon R. Mitchell Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor; Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-7028
  • Sean Horton Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor
  • Sara Scharoun Benson Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor; WE-SPARK Health Institute
  • Veronika Mogyorody School of Creative Arts, Visual Arts and the Built Environment, University of Windsor
  • Paula M. van Wyk Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor; WE-SPARK Health Institute https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8452-5303

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14288/hfjc.v18i2.868

Keywords:

Call to Action, Disability, Fitness Facilities, Accessibility, Unviersal Design, Lived Experience, Social Ecological Model, Interviews, Reflexive Thematic Analysis

Abstract

Background: Gyms are a site for exercise that are of interest to people with and without a disability. Ensuring gyms are accessible and inclusive may facilitate long-term health and well-being as individuals’ abilities change across the lifespan. Yet, fitness providers often fail to consider the needs of people with a disability in gyms. Understanding diverse users’ experiences with gym-based exercise may inform decision-makers of resources, partnerships, and actions that can improve accessibility and inclusion. Purpose: This study aimed to understand users’ perspectives of organizational, community, and policy factors that influence inclusive practices in gyms. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with diverse participants. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Thirty-five participants with (n = 13) and without a disability (n = 22) were interviewed. Three themes were generated: (1) Accessibility for All, (2) Acknowledging Challenges to Accessibility, and (3) Bridging Knowledge Gaps. Participants acknowledged disability as a universal experience, emphasizing that accessibility was needed, important, and beneficial to everyone. They also identified challenges to practicing inclusion in gyms, such as cost of equipment and limited knowledge of disability. Conclusion: Five calls to action were derived from participants’ insights. The calls to action illustrated a need to develop and support (e.g., fund, enforce) accessibility standards for gyms, empower providers and staff to implement accessible practices, and collaborate with people who have a disability to develop sustainable, community-driven approaches that facilitate meaningful inclusion in gyms. Collective actions from users, organizations, communities, and policymakers may enable systemic change, transforming gyms into inclusive spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AODA Alliance. (2024, January 4). Second in series of CBC News reports on Ontario’s inaccessibility crisis addresses Ford Government’s failure to effectively enforce the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. https://www.aodaalliance.org/whats-new/second-in-series-of-cbc-news-reports-on-ontarios-inaccessibility-crisis-addresses-ford-governments-failure-to-effectively-enforce-the-accessibility-for-ontarians-with-disabilities-act/

Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. (2024, April 12). Accessibility in all Ontario public buildings by 2030. https://aoda.ca/accessibility-in-all-ontario-public-buildings-by-2030/

Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K. P., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2011). Universal accessibility of “accessible” fitness and recreational facilities for persons with mobility disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.28.1.1

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Davey, L., & Jenkinson, E. (2023). Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In S. Bager-Charleson & A. McBeath (Eds.), Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research (pp. 19–38). Springer.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, D. M. Y., Ross, T., Leo, J., Buliung, R. N., Shirazipour, C. H., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., & Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K. P. (2021). A scoping review of evidence-informed recommendations for designing inclusive playgrounds. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 2, 664595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.664595

Bumble, J. L., & Carter, E. W. (2021). Application of the World Café to disability issues: A systematic review. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 32(3), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207320949962

Butzer, J. F., Virva, R., Kozlowski, A. J., Cistaro, R., & Perry, M. L. (2021). Participation by design: Integrating a social ecological approach with universal design to increase participation and add value for consumers. Disability and Health Journal, 14(2), 101006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.101006

Canadian Human Rights Commission. (2025, February 6). About the Accessible Canada Act. https://www.chrc-ccdp.gc.ca/individuals/accessibility/about-accessible-canada-act

Centre for Excellence in universal design. (n.d.). About Universal Design. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from https://universaldesign.ie/about-universal-design

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cunningham, C., O’Donoghue, G., Cosgrave, S., Sands, T., Leacy, B., Markievicz, I., Monaghan, A., & Shields, N. (2023). Gym staff perspectives on disability inclusion: A qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 45(3), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2036826

Dolmage, J. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9708722

Easter Seals. (n.d.). Disability in Canada: Know the facts. Retrieved May 2, 2025, from https://easterseals.ca/en/disability-in-canada-facts-figures/

Giacobbi, P. R., Poczwardowski, A., & Hager, P. (2005). A pragmatic research philosophy for applied sport psychology. The Sport Psychologist, 19(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.19.1.18

Giancarlo, A., Shannon, D., & Kobayashi, A. (2016). Intersecting Oppressions: African Nova Scotians with disabilities and possibilities arising from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 5(2), 98–130. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v5i2.274

Kitchin, P. J., Peile, C., & Lowther, J. (2019). Mobilizing capacity to achieve the mainstreaming of disability sport. Managing Sport and Leisure, 24(6), 424–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2019.1684839

Lesch, L., Wicker, P., & Gröben, B. (2025). Exploring the inclusion of people with disabilities in gyms: Organizational capacity needs. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 55(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-024-00973-3

Martin Ginis, K. A., Ma, J. K., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., & Rimmer, J. H. (2016). A systematic review of review articles addressing factors related to physical activity participation among children and adults with physical disabilities. Health Psychology Review, 10(4), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1198240

McConnell, K., McFeeters, C., Marley, J., Crawford, A., & Pedlow, K. (2025). A co-designed mixed methods study on community-based gym exercise for non-ambulant adults with childhood-onset disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 47(2), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2346628

McKenzie, G., Kennedy, R. A., Willis, C., & Shields, N. (2025). Industry perspectives on the implementation of social support for young adults with disability in community gyms: A qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 47(16), 4106–4115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2440136

McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401

Mitchell, F. R., Horton, S., Scharoun Benson, S., Mogyorody, V., & van Wyk, P. M. (2025). Comparing performance and experience in a conventional and accessible gym: a mixed methods study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2544946

Moore, A., Boyle, B., & Lynch, H. (2023). Designing public playgrounds for inclusion: A scoping review of grey literature guidelines for universal design. Children’s Geographies, 21(3), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2022.2073197

Nocera, V. G., Taverno Ross, S. E., & Hasson, R. E. (2022). Equality- versus equity-based approaches to promoting health and fitness in diverse populations. ACSM’s Health & Fitness Journal, 26(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1249/FIT.0000000000000724

Richardson, E. V., Smith, B., & Papathomas, A. (2017). Crossing boundaries: The perceived impact of disabled fitness instructors in the gym. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 29, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.12.006

Rimmer, J. H. (2012). Getting beyond the plateau: Bridging the gap between rehabilitation and community-based exercise. PM&R: The Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation, 4(11), 857–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.08.008

Rimmer, J. H., & Marques, A. C. (2012). Physical activity for people with disabilities. The Lancet, 380(9838), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61028-9

Rimmer, J. H., Padalabalanarayanan, S., Malone, L. A., & Mehta, T. (2017). Fitness facilities still lack accessibility for people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.011

Rivera, E., Smith, C., & Hesketh, K. D. (2024). Priority populations’ experiences of the accessibility and inclusion of recreation centres: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17595-3

Sharon-David, H., Siekanska, M., & Tenenbaum, G. (2021). Are gyms fit for all? A scoping review of the barriers and facilitators to gym-based exercise participation experienced by people with physical disabilities. Performance Enhancement & Health, 9(1), 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2020.100170

Simplican, S. C., Leader, G., Kosciulek, J., & Leahy, M. (2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008

Staeger-Wilson, K., Barnett, C., Mahoney, S., & Sampson, D. H. (2012). Planning for an inclusive campus recreation facility and program. Recreational Sports Journal, 36(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1123/rsj.36.1.37

Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Practicing universal design. In Universal design: Creating inclusive environments (pp. 67–93). John Wiley & Sons.

Trainor, L. R., & Bundon, A. (2021). Developing the craft: Reflexive accounts of doing reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(5), 705-726. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1840423

Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7

World Health Organization. (2018). Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. Retrieved March 14, 2025, from https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/272722/9789241514187-eng.pdf

Yi, E., Jeon, S.-W., & Oh, A. (2022). Development of evaluation indicators for sports facilities for people with disabilities considering the universal design: Focusing on the Republic of Korea. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 10(11), 2115 https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112151

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Mitchell, F. R., Horton, S., Scharoun Benson, S., Mogyorody, V., & van Wyk, P. M. (2025). Agents of Change: Understanding User Perspectives to Guide Inclusive Gym Practices. The Health & Fitness Journal of Canada, 18(2), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.14288/hfjc.v18i2.868

Issue

Section

ARTICLES

Funding data