Distinct effects of different frequency active interruptions to sitting on glycemic control in Type 2 Diabetes

Oral Presentation A7.2

Authors

  • Ashleigh R. Homer Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute; Australian Catholic University
  • Frances C. Taylor Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute; Australian Catholic University
  • Paddy C. Dempsey Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute; University of Cambridge; University of Leicester
  • Michael J. Wheeler Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute; Australian Catholic University; University of Leicester
  • Parneet Sethi Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
  • Megan S. Grace Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute; University of Queensland
  • Daniel J. Green University of Western Australia
  • Neale D. Cohen Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
  • Robyn N. Larsen Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute; University of Melbourne
  • Bronwyn A. Kingwell Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute; CSL Ltd; University of Melbourne; Monash University
  • Neville Owen Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute; Swinburne University of Technology
  • David W. Dunstan Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute; Australian Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14288/hfjc.v14i3.400

Keywords:

Sedentary Behaviour, Physical Activity, Glucose Metabolism, Type 2 Diabetes, Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Abstract

Background: Active interruptions to sitting time are beneficial for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. With recent movements towards less prescriptive physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines, it is relevant to determine whether the frequency of interruptions to sitting time is important for health. The optimal frequency of active interruptions to sitting time is yet to be examined when total activity time is standardized. Purpose: To examine whether the frequency of interruptions to sitting time involving simple resistance activities (SRAs), compared to uninterrupted sitting, differentially affected 22 h glycemic control in adults with medication-controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Twenty-four participants (13 men; mean±SD age 62±8 years) completed three 8 h laboratory conditions: SIT: uninterrupted sitting; SRA3: sitting interrupted with 3 min of SRAs every 30 min; and, SRA6: sitting interrupted with 6 min of SRAs every 60 min. Flash glucose monitors assessed glycemic control over a 22 h period. Results: No differences were observed between conditions for overall 22 h glycemic control as measured by AUCtotal, mean glucose and time in hyperglycemia. During the 3.5 h post-lunch period, mean glucose was significantly lower during SRA6 (10.1 mmol.L-1, 95%CI 9.2, 11.0) compared to SIT (11.1 mmol.L-1, 95%CI 10.2, 12.0; P = 0.006). Post-lunch iAUCnet was significantly lower during SRA6 (6.2 mmol.h.L-1, 95%CI 3.3, 9.1) compared to SIT (9.9 mmol.h.L-1, 95%CI 7.0, 12.9; P = 0.003). Time in hyperglycemia was significantly lower post-lunch during SRA6 (1.5 h, 95%CI 1.0, 1.9, P = 0.001) compared to SIT (2.2 h, 95%CI 1.7, 2.6). Nocturnal mean glucose was significantly lower following the SRA3 condition (7.6 mmol.L-1, 95%CI 7.1, 8.1) compared to SIT (8.1 mmol.L-1, 95%CI 7.6, 8.7, P = 0.024). Conclusions: With standardized total activity time, less-frequent active interruptions to sitting may acutely improve glycemic control; while more-frequent interruptions may be beneficial for nocturnal glucose in those with medication-controlled T2D. Funding: This research was supported by a Heart Foundation Vanguard Grant (Award no. 101449), a NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence grant #1057608, and the Victorian Government OIS scheme.

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Homer, A. R., Taylor, F. C., Dempsey, P. C., Wheeler, M. J., Sethi, P., Grace, M. S., Green, D. J., Cohen, N. D., Larsen, R. N., Kingwell, B. A., Owen, N., & Dunstan, D. W. (2021). Distinct effects of different frequency active interruptions to sitting on glycemic control in Type 2 Diabetes: Oral Presentation A7.2. The Health & Fitness Journal of Canada, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.14288/hfjc.v14i3.400

Most read articles by the same author(s)