A brief critique of physiological employment standards for physically demanding public safety occupations

  • Roy J. Shephard University of Toronto
Keywords: Body mass, Energy costs, Fatigue, Intra-individual variation, Misclassification, Predicted aerobic fitness, Prolonged activity, Task reactivity

Abstract

Background. The time to complete occupational circuits, estimates of maximal aerobic power and simple measures of muscle strength are currently used as employment standards where the safety of the public is judged at risk.

Purpose. To make a brief critique of the procedures presently used with a view to identifying on-going weaknesses in assessments.

Methods. Analysis has focused upon issues of task reactivity, task duration, test components and test accuracy, with particular reference to assessments of maximal aerobic power.

Results. Test reactivity may exaggerate apparent job requirements. Current tests are of a few minutes duration; extrapolation to longer periods of activity are limited by inter-individual differences, including a possible greater tolerance of prolonged activity in women.

Author Biography

Roy J. Shephard, University of Toronto
Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education, University of Toronto
Published
2013-12-30
How to Cite
Shephard, R. J. (2013). A brief critique of physiological employment standards for physically demanding public safety occupations. The Health & Fitness Journal of Canada, 6(4), 108-115. https://doi.org/10.14288/hfjc.v6i4.153
Section
OUR PERSPECTIVE

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>